Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-06 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Titan gray | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 949.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2691mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 8 Plus is slightly better than LG K92, having an 87.1 score against 85.4. The iPhone 8 Plus construction is a little lighter and just a bit thinner than the LG K92, although it was released 3 years before. Apple iPhone 8 Plus has a little sharper screen than LG K92, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920px and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit greater screen pixels density.
LG K92 has a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Apple iPhone 8 Plus, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. IPhone 8 Plus has a greater performance than LG K92, because although it has less CPU cores and 3 GB less RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
LG K92 shoots better pictures and videos than iPhone 8 Plus, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same video resolution, the LG K92 also counts with a lot bigger sensor which offers a lot higher photo and video quality and a much more mega-pixels camera.
The LG K92 features a superior battery lifetime than Apple iPhone 8 Plus, because it has a 49 percent greater battery size.
Although Apple iPhone 8 Plus is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG K92, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG K92. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy the LG K92, and give up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.