Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-06 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Titan gray | Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone X has a score of 88.1, which is a little bit better than LG K92's 85.4 score. The iPhone X is an older phone than LG K92, but it's a little thinner and somewhat lighter anyway. IPhone X counts with a more vivid display than LG K92, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit greater amount of pixels per inch of display and a quite better 1125 x 2436 resolution.
Apple iPhone X features a superior hardware performance than LG K92, because although it has less CPU cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit. The LG K92 counts with a superior camera than iPhone X, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have a F1.8 camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the LG K92 also counts with a lot better 64 mega pixels resolution back camera and a way larger camera sensor shooting lot better quality videos and pictures.
LG K92 counts with a very superior storage to install applications and games than Apple iPhone X, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG K92 has a really longer battery duration than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 47 percent larger battery size.
Although Apple iPhone X is a better device, it costs a lot more than LG K92, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG K92. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy the LG K92, giving up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.