Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-06 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Titan gray | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG K92 has an overall score of 85.4, which is just a bit better than iPhone XR's 82 general score. LG K92 is a just a little bit heavier phone than iPhone XR, but both of them are 0.33inches thick. Apple iPhone XR has a bit more vivid screen than LG K92, although it has a lot lower 828 x 1792px resolution, a bit smaller display and a bit inferior pixel number per inch of screen.
Apple iPhone XR has a quite superior performance than LG K92, because although it has 3 GB less RAM and less cores , it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit. The LG K92 counts with a much bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone XR, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The LG K92 has better battery performance than iPhone XR, because it has a 36% more battery size. The LG K92 counts with a much better camera than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same aperture and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the LG K92 also counts with a much higher resolution back facing camera and a way bigger sensor.
The LG K92 not only is the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.