Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-06 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Titan gray | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG K92 is a bit better than iPhone XS, with a general score of 85.4 against 84.2. Although the LG K92 is incredibly newer than the iPhone XS, it is somewhat heavier and just a bit thicker. IPhone XS counts with a brighter screen than LG K92, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels and a little bit better pixel density.
LG K92 features much more storage capacity for games and applications than iPhone XS, because it has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage. IPhone XS has a better hardware performance than LG K92, because although it has lesser RAM and less cores , it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
LG K92 shoots better photos and videos than Apple iPhone XS, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have the same video definition and a same size camera aperture, the LG K92 also counts with a much higher resolution camera in the back and a way bigger sensor capturing lot better quality photos and videos.
LG K92 counts with a very superior battery lifetime than iPhone XS, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the LG K92 is also a bargain compared to the other phones, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.