Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-06 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Titan gray | Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG K92 has an overall score of 85.4, which is slightly better than Google Pixel 2 XL's 82.5 overall score. LG K92's construction is noticeably newer than the Google Pixel 2 XL's, but it is heavier and just a bit thicker. The Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a little bit better looking display than LG K92, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a better 1440 x 2880px resolution.
The LG K92 has a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG K92 also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a little bit better hardware performance than LG K92, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The LG K92 counts with a lot better camera than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same aperture, the LG K92 also has a lot bigger sensor which offers a lot better photo and video quality and a way higher resolution camera in the back.
The LG K92 counts with just a bit better battery duration than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although LG K92 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Google Pixel 2 XL, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel 2 XL. If you want to save some money, you can buy the Google Pixel 2 XL, and give up a couple features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.