Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-06 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Titan gray | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG K92 is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 3, having an 85.4 score against 80. Even though LG K92 is extremely newer than Google Pixel 3, it's extremely heavier and a little bit thicker. The Google Pixel 3 features just a little better processing power than LG K92, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Google Pixel 3 has a little sharper screen than LG K92, because although it has a quite smaller display and a quite lower 1080 x 2160px resolution, it also counts with a bit greater screen density. LG K92 shoots way better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have a same size aperture, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video resolution, the LG K92 also has a lot more MP back facing camera and a lot larger sensor shooting way better quality photos.
LG K92 features a lot bigger memory for applications and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has an external memory card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB and more internal storage. The LG K92 has a much longer battery duration than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 37% more battery size.
Although LG K92 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Google Pixel 3. So if you need that extra features, you can buy LG K92, else you can save some dollars and buy the Google Pixel 3, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.