Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-06 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Titan gray | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG K92 is a bit better than Google Pixel 3 XL, with a score of 85.4 against 80.7. LG K92 is a newer device than Google Pixel 3 XL, although it is just a little bit heavier and just a little bit thicker. Google Pixel 3 XL has a little sharper display than LG K92, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2960 resolution and more pixels per screen inch.
The LG K92 has a much bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB. Google Pixel 3 XL features a little better performance than LG K92, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
LG K92 captures much better videos and photos than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and a same size camera aperture, the LG K92 also has a lot larger back camera sensor taking much better quality videos and photographs and a much more megapixels back facing camera.
LG K92 counts with a little longer battery life than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3430mAh.
Although LG K92 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Google Pixel 3 XL, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel 3 XL. If you prefer to save some money, you can get Google Pixel 3 XL, giving up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.