Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-11-06 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Titan gray | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG K92 is a bit better than Google Pixel 3a, getting a global score of 85.4 against 78.8. Both phones we compare here come with Android OS (operating system), but the LG K92 has 10 version and Google Pixel 3a has Android 11 version. Although the LG K92 is newer than the Google Pixel 3a, it's a little thicker and noticeably heavier.
The LG K92 has a little bit better performance than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG K92 also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Google Pixel 3a counts with a bit more vivid screen than LG K92, because although it has a bit smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2220 pixels, it also counts with a little bit greater display density.
The LG K92 takes much clearer pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the same video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the LG K92 also has a lot better resolution back camera and a way bigger sensor providing a way better image quality.
LG K92 features a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG K92 counts with improved battery duration than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Although LG K92 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Google Pixel 3a, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 3a. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get Google Pixel 3a, giving up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.