Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-11-06 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Titan gray | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG K92 is a little bit better than Google Pixel 3a XL, having an 85.4 score against 78.9. Both phones in this comparison use Android operating system, but LG K92 has the previous 10 version and Google Pixel 3a XL has Android 11. The LG K92 construction is newer, but heavier and a bit thicker than the Google Pixel 3a XL.
The Google Pixel 3a XL and LG K92 feature really similar displays, because although the Google Pixel 3a XL has a bit worse 1080 x 2160 resolution and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit better pixel number in each screen inch. LG K92 features a much greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG K92 has just a little better processing power than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG K92 also has 2 GB more RAM. The LG K92 features just a little better battery duration than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has an 8 percent bigger battery capacity. The LG K92 takes greater videos and photos than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the same 30 fps video frame rates and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the LG K92 also has a lot bigger back camera sensor capturing much higher quality videos and photographs and a way more MP camera in the back.
Although LG K92 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Google Pixel 3a XL, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Google Pixel 3a XL. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy the Google Pixel 3a XL, giving up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.