Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-06 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Titan gray | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG K92 has a general score of 85.4, which is just a bit better than Google Pixel 4's general score of 81.9. The LG K92 is a newer phone than Google Pixel 4, although it is a lot heavier and a bit thicker. The Google Pixel 4 features a little more vivid display than LG K92, because although it has a bit smaller display and a little lower 1080 x 2280 resolution, it also counts with a bit more pixels per display inch.
LG K92 counts with a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 4, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Google Pixel 4 features a bit superior processor than LG K92. Both have the same number of cores and 6 GB of RAM memory.
LG K92 features a really longer battery duration than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 43% greater battery size. The LG K92 captures much clearer pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for shooting images and video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the LG K92 also counts with a back facing camera with a much better 64 megapixels resolution and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot higher quality pictures.
The LG K92 is more expensive than the Google Pixel 4, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.