Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-06 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Titan gray | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG K92 has a score of 85.4, which is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 4 XL's 82.9 overall score. The LG K92 body is newer, but just a bit thicker and just a little bit heavier than Google Pixel 4 XL. Google Pixel 4 XL features a little bit better looking display than LG K92, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3040 and a better number of pixels per inch of screen.
LG K92 has a much better storage to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a bit superior processing unit than LG K92. Both have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores.
LG K92 counts with a bit superior battery life than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 4000mAh battery size. The LG K92 counts with a very superior camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for capturing images and video in low-light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the LG K92 also counts with a much bigger back-facing camera sensor taking much better quality videos and photographs and a way higher 64 mega-pixels resolution back camera.
LG K92 not only is the best devices in our comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.