Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-11-06 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Titan gray | Just black |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG K92 has a global score of 85.4, which is slightly better than the Google Pixel 4a's general score of 82.9. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but LG K92 has an older 10 version while Google Pixel 4a has Android 11. Even being the best phone in this comparison review, it must be told that it is also a noticeably heavier and a little bit thicker phone.
The Google Pixel 4a features a bit better performance than LG K92. Both of them have the same number of cores and 6 GB of RAM memory. The Google Pixel 4a counts with a little more vivid display than LG K92, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per screen inch.
LG K92 has a much bigger storage for applications and games than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have the same internal storage, the LG K92 also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB. LG K92 takes a lot better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low light photos, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the LG K92 also counts with a much larger sensor which provides a way higher photo and video quality and a camera with a way higher resolution.
The LG K92 counts with superior battery life than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3140mAh.
LG K92 costs a little more money than Google Pixel 4a, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.