Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-11-06 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Titan gray | Clearly white and Just black |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a general score of 87.5, which is just a bit better than LG K92's 85.4 score. Even when Google Pixel 4a 5G and LG K92 were released with only a few months difference, Google Pixel 4a 5G is just a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter. Both devices in this review include Android OS (Operating System), but Google Pixel 4a 5G has newer 11 version and LG K92 has Android 10 version, so it offers lots of additional features and optimized performance.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with just a bit better display than LG K92, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a quite greater pixels density. The LG K92 features a way bigger memory for apps and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the LG K92 also has an external memory card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a bit better processing power than LG K92. They have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores. LG K92 captures much better videos and photos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has lower video frame rates and a smaller aperture which is not good for taking photos and videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the LG K92 also counts with a lot larger sensor and a back facing camera with a lot better resolution.
The LG K92 has a bit longer battery duration than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 3 percent greater battery size.
Although Google Pixel 4a 5G is a better device, it costs more than LG K92, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG K92. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Google Pixel 4a 5G, otherwise you can save some money and buy the LG K92, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.