Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-06 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Titan gray | Just black and Sorta sage |
| -- | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 is slightly better than the LG K92, getting a overall score of 89 against 85.4. Google Pixel 5 is a a little thinner and extremely lighter cellphone than the LG K92, even when both were only released 1 months apart. Google Pixel 5 counts with a little better performance than LG K92, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Google Pixel 5 also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Google Pixel 5 features just a bit better looking display than LG K92, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little better display pixel density. The LG K92 captures better photos and videos than Google Pixel 5, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate and a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the LG K92 also counts with a back facing camera with a way better 64 mega-pixels resolution and a way bigger sensor taking lot better quality photos and videos.
LG K92 features a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the LG K92 also has an external memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Google Pixel 5 features just a little better battery lifetime than LG K92, because it has 4080mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Although Google Pixel 5 is a better device, it costs more money than the LG K92, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG K92. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get the LG K92, giving up some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.