Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 92.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-11-06 | 2024-03-22 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 8.36 ounces |
| Titan gray | Agate Grey and Frozen Berry |
| -- | Glass and Titanium |
| $ 395.00 | $ 1389.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2800 x 1280 pixels |
| IPS LCD | LTPO |
| 393 pixels per inch | 453 pixels per inch |
| -- | 5000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 24 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 1 TB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 23.2 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 7.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a score of 92.1, which is just a bit better than the LG K92's 85.4 global score. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is a notably newer phone than LG K92, although it's a bit thicker and somewhat heavier. These phones work with Android operating system, but Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has the newer 14 version while LG K92 has Android 10.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a much better display than LG K92, because it has a bit bigger screen, a little more pixels per inch of display and a quite better 1280 x 2800 resolution. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a very superior storage to install applications and games than LG K92, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a bit better processing unit than LG K92, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has 18 GB more RAM memory. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a bit better camera than LG K92, because although it has a way worse resolution back facing camera and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, it also counts with a way larger sensor shooting way higher quality pictures and videos and a much bigger camera aperture to take better images and videos in low light situations.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a very superior battery performance than LG K92, because it has a 40% larger battery capacity.
Although Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG K92, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG K92. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy the LG K92, giving up some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.