Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | HTC |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-11-06 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Titan gray | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| -- | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 3 |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG K92 is a little bit better than HTC One M9, getting a overall score of 85.4 against 77.7. Even though the LG K92 is way heavier than the HTC One M9, it's somewhat thinner and extremely newer. Both of these phones have Android OS, but the LG K92 has a more recent 10 version while HTC One M9 has Android 5.0 version.
HTC One M9 has a sharper display than LG K92, because although it has a much smaller screen and a little lower resolution of 1920 x 1080, it also counts with a little higher display pixels density. HTC One M9 has a bit more powerful processing unit than LG K92, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have 8 processing cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64 bits CPU and an additional graphics processor.
LG K92 captures better photographs and videos than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the LG K92 also has a bigger back camera sensor capturing higher quality pictures, a larger aperture to capture better low light photography and video and a much more megapixels camera in the back.
The LG K92 features a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than HTC One M9, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG K92 counts with a way better battery life than HTC One M9, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 2840mAh.
Although LG K92 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the HTC One M9, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the HTC One M9. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy HTC One M9, giving up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.