Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | HTC |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-06 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Titan gray | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG K92 has a global score of 85.4, which is better than the HTC U Ultra's overall score of 77. The LG K92 design is way newer, but a bit thicker and heavier than HTC U Ultra. The LG K92 features a bit better processor than HTC U Ultra, because it has more cores and a larger amount of RAM. HTC U Ultra has a slightly better looking display than LG K92, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a better pixel quantity per inch in the display.
LG K92 takes much better photos and videos than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video quality, the LG K92 also has a much higher 64 megapixels resolution back camera and a bigger back camera sensor capturing higher quality photographs and videos.
LG K92 counts with a bigger storage to install games and applications than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have an external SD slot that supports up to 1,95 TB, the LG K92 also has 128 GB internal memory. The LG K92 features superior battery duration than HTC U Ultra, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The LG K92 not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.