Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0, 4.4.2 |
| 2020-11-06 | 2014-05-27 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 5.76 x 2.94 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 5.26 ounces |
| Titan gray | Black, Gold, Pink, Purple and White |
| $ 395.00 | $ 155.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 10 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.40 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 10.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 548 hours standby time 19 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG K92 has a global score of 85.4, which is much better than LG G3's 76.4 global score. Both phones in this comparison work with Android operating system, but the LG K92 has a more recent 10 version and LG G3 has Android 5.0 version, counting with some additional features. The LG K92 is a much newer and just a bit thinner device than LG G3, although it is a lot heavier.
The LG G3 counts with a much sharper display than LG K92, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 and more pixels per inch in the screen. The LG K92 has a much bigger storage capacity for apps and games than LG G3, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG G3 features just a bit better hardware performance than LG K92, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and a lower number of cores , it also counts with an extra graphics processing unit. LG K92 features better battery duration than LG G3, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity. The LG K92 shoots much clearer videos and photos than LG G3, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video definition, the LG K92 also has a way bigger sensor, a way bigger camera aperture and a way higher resolution back-facing camera.
Although LG K92 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG G3, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG G3. If you prefer to save some money, you can get the LG G3, letting go a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.