Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-11-06 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Titan gray | Black and Gray |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG K92 is much better than the LG G7 Fit, getting an 85.4 score against 77. LG K92 is a newer cellphone than LG G7 Fit, but it's way heavier and a little thicker. These devices have Android operating system, but LG K92 has the older 10 version while LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo. The LG K92 counts with a bit better hardware performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has a higher number of cores and a greater amount of RAM memory.
The LG G7 Fit counts with a much more vibrant display than LG K92, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixels density and a higher 1440 x 3120 resolution. LG K92 features a lot better camera than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the LG K92 also has a much bigger back camera sensor providing a much higher image quality, a camera with much more mega-pixels and a larger aperture to capture better low-light captures and video.
LG K92 has a way bigger memory for games and applications than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB, the LG K92 also has 128 GB internal memory. The LG K92 features improved battery life than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.