Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-11-06 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Titan gray | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG K92 has a score of 85.4, which is a little bit better than LG G7 ThinQ's global score of 81. Although LG K92 is much newer than LG G7 ThinQ, it's heavier and a little thicker. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but LG K92 has an older 10 version and LG G7 ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie version.
LG G7 ThinQ counts with a lot better looking screen than LG K92, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3120px and a greater pixel density. The LG K92 features a greater memory to store more apps and games than LG G7 ThinQ, and although they both have an external memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB, the LG K92 also has more internal memory.
LG G7 ThinQ features a bit better performance than LG K92, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The LG K92 has improved battery lifetime than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. The LG K92 counts with a much better camera than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for capturing pictures in low light situations and slower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the LG K92 also counts with a way larger sensor providing a lot better image quality and a much better 64 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera.
Although LG K92 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the LG G7 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG G7 ThinQ. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy LG K92, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the LG G7 ThinQ, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.