Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-11-06 | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Titan gray | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG K92 is slightly better than the LG G8X ThinQ, with an 85.4 score against 82.7. Both of these phones come with the same Android 10 operating system. LG K92 is a a little heavier phone than LG G8X ThinQ, but both of them are equally thin. LG G8X ThinQ has a bit superior processing unit than LG K92. They have the same RAM memory amount and 8 cores.
The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a little more vivid screen than LG K92, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a little bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a bit higher pixel density. LG K92 and LG G8X ThinQ feature incredibly similar memory for apps and games, they have a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The LG G8X ThinQ's battery lifetime is very similar to the battery duration in LG K92. LG K92 shoots much better photographs and videos than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has worse video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and a same size aperture, the LG K92 also counts with a way larger back camera sensor taking lot better quality photos and videos and a way more MP back-facing camera.
Although LG K92 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG G8X ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG G8X ThinQ. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the LG K92, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the LG G8X ThinQ, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.