Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-11-06 | 2015-10-01 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Titan gray | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| -- | Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG K92 has a general score of 85.4, which is slightly better than LG V10's 78.6 score. LG K92's body is noticeably newer and a little bit thinner, but a bit heavier than the LG V10. Both of these devices come with Android OS, but LG K92 has a newer 10 version and LG V10 has Android 5.1. LG K92 counts with a superior processing power than LG V10, because it has a larger amount of RAM and more cpu cores.
LG V10 counts with a more vivid display than LG K92, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixel density and a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution. The LG K92 captures better pictures and videos than LG V10, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and a F1.8 aperture, the LG K92 also counts with a camera with a way higher resolution and a much bigger back camera sensor taking way higher quality photographs.
The LG K92 has more storage capacity to install games and applications than LG V10, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB, the LG K92 also has 64 GB more internal storage. The LG K92 features better battery duration than LG V10, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
The LG K92 costs more money than LG V10, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.