Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-06 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Titan gray | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG K92 is a bit better than LG V35 ThinQ, with an 85.4 score against 81.3. LG K92's design is noticeably newer than the LG V35 ThinQ's, although it's somewhat thicker and extremely heavier. LG V35 ThinQ has a bit better CPU than LG K92. Both have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core CPU. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little sharper screen than LG K92, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2880 resolution and a better screen density.
The LG K92 captures much better videos and photos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for shooting images or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the LG K92 also counts with a much better 64 MP resolution camera in the back and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a much better image quality.
The LG K92 has a bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, and although they both have an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG K92 also has 128 GB internal storage. The LG K92 has longer battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Although LG K92 is a better device, it costs a lot more than LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG V35 ThinQ. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy LG K92, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the LG V35 ThinQ, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.