Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-11-06 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Titan gray | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG K92 has an overall score of 85.4, which is a bit better than the LG V40 ThinQ's general score of 81.2. These devices have the same Android 10 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't notice any difference regarding that. LG K92's construction is way newer, but just a bit thicker and heavier than LG V40 ThinQ.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with just a bit better processing power than LG K92. They have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM amount. The LG V40 ThinQ has a bit sharper screen than LG K92, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher screen pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 3120.
The LG K92 features a bigger memory for games and applications than LG V40 ThinQ, and although they both have a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB, the LG K92 also has 64 GB more internal memory capacity. The LG K92 counts with a superior camera than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rates and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for shooting photographs in low-light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the LG K92 also counts with a much bigger back-facing camera sensor and a lot more megapixels camera in the back.
LG K92 has longer battery performance than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 21% greater battery size.
Although LG K92 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG V40 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG V40 ThinQ. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy LG K92, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the LG V40 ThinQ, resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.