Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-11-06 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Titan gray | Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 11.77 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ has an overall score of 87.6, which is slightly better than LG K92's score of 85.4. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but the LG V60 ThinQ has the newer 11 version while LG K92 has Android 10 version, so it provides the user lots of additional features and improved performance. The LG V60 ThinQ is a just a little bit thicker and a little bit heavier phone than the LG K92.
LG V60 ThinQ counts with a bit better screen than LG K92, because it has a quite bigger display, a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels and a just a little more pixels per inch in the display. LG V60 ThinQ and LG K92 both have similar memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos, both of them have equal internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V60 ThinQ has a little faster processor than LG K92, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM memory. LG V60 ThinQ features better battery duration than LG K92, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The LG K92 has a superior camera than LG V60 ThinQ, although it has a smaller sensor capturing worse quality photographs and videos, they both have the same video frame rates, a back facing camera with a 64 MP resolution, the same diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
The LG V60 ThinQ not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.