Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-06 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Titan gray | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is slightly better than LG K92, with a global score of 87.1 against 85.4. Even when LG Velvet and the LG K92 were released only a couple of months apart, LG Velvet is somewhat lighter and a little thinner. LG Velvet has a little better processing power than LG K92. They have the same RAM memory amount and 8 processing cores.
The LG Velvet counts with just a bit better display than LG K92, because it has a bit higher 1080 x 2460 pixels resolution, a little bit more pixels per inch in the display and a bit bigger screen. LG K92 has just a bit better camera than LG Velvet, and although they both have a same size camera sensor, the same 3840x2160 video quality, the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same aperture, the LG K92 also has a back camera with a much better resolution.
The LG Velvet features as much memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos as the LG K92 one, both have exactly the same internal memory and a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG Velvet has a little better battery lifetime than LG K92, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the LG Velvet is also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.