Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-11-06 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| Titan gray | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Wing is slightly better than the LG K92, getting a score of 91.2 against 85.4. These phones work with the same Android 10 OS, so you shouldn't notice any difference regarding that. Even being the best phone in this comparison review, LG Wing's construction is a lot thicker and noticeably heavier than the LG K92.
LG Wing has a bit sharper screen than LG K92, because it has a little better display pixel density, a little bit larger screen and a slightly higher 1080 x 2460 resolution. LG Wing features a little bit better hardware performance than LG K92, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG Wing also has more RAM.
LG Wing counts with a bigger storage to store more games and applications than LG K92, and although they both have a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG Wing also has 256 GB internal memory. The LG Wing's battery duration is just as good as the LG K92 one. The LG Wing has a little bit better camera than LG K92, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, a same resolution camera and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the LG Wing also has higher 60 frames per second video frame rates and a larger sensor capturing higher quality videos and photographs.
Although LG Wing is a better device, it is way more expensive than LG K92, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG K92. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy LG K92, letting go a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.