Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 89.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-11-06 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Titan gray | Midnight magenta and Solar black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 544.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 18.58 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola edge has a score of 89.6, which is a little bit better than LG K92's overall score of 85.4. These phones include the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so they should provide identical OS features. Even though Motorola edge and the LG K92 were only released with a few months difference, the Motorola edge design is a little lighter but also thicker than the LG K92.
Motorola edge counts with a display that's just as good as the display in LG K92, and although the Motorola edge has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a little inferior pixel amount per inch in the screen, they both have a screen with the same size. The Motorola edge counts with a little bit better memory capacity for games and applications than LG K92, because although it has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal storage.
Motorola edge has a bit more powerful processor than LG K92. They have a Octa-Core CPU and the same RAM amount. Motorola edge captures clearer pictures and videos than LG K92, and although they both have the same aperture, a back camera with a 64 MP resolution, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola edge also has a larger sensor taking better quality photographs.
The Motorola edge features a little longer battery duration than LG K92, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Although Motorola edge is a better device, it costs more than the LG K92, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG K92. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Motorola edge, else you can save some dollars and buy the LG K92, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.