Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-11-06 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Titan gray | Interstellar Black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG K92 has an overall score of 85.4, which is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro's 83.4 general score. The LG K92 body is just a little bit thinner than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro, but it's just a little heavier and was released 2 years before. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the LG K92 has 10 version while Motorola Edge 40 Pro has Android 13 version.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a bit sharper screen than LG K92. Both have the same display pixel density, a same size screen and the same exact 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution. The LG K92 counts with an extremely better processor than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
LG K92 features a superior storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features just a little better battery performance than LG K92, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features just a bit better camera than LG K92, because although it has a way less megapixels back camera, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also counts with a much larger sensor taking much better quality videos and photos and a lot higher video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.