Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-11-06 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Titan gray | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is slightly better than LG K92, with an 86.3 score against 85.4. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a newer device, and it's also a little thinner and a little lighter than the LG K92. Both of these devices have Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 50 Pro has 14 version while LG K92 has Android 10 version, giving you a lot of extra features.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a sharper display than LG K92. They have the same exact 1080 x 2400px resolution, the same screen pixel density and a display of the same size. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has just a bit more storage capacity for apps and games than LG K92, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage.
The LG K92 has a much better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a bit superior battery lifetime than LG K92, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Pro shoots a little bit better videos and photos than LG K92, because although it has a way worse 50 mega-pixels resolution camera and a lower (4K) video quality, it also counts with a way larger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photography and a lot bigger sensor taking much higher quality videos and photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.