Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-11-06 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Titan gray | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| -- | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a bit better than LG K92, having an 87.1 score against 85.4. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a noticeably newer and just a little bit lighter device than the LG K92, although it's just a little bit thicker. Both of these devices come with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has 14 version and LG K92 has Android 10.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a way better display than LG K92. Both of them have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a same size display and the same count of pixels in each display inch. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features just a bit more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than LG K92, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 384 GB more internal storage.
LG K92 has a lot better processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 6 GB less RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra captures a little bit better photos and videos than LG K92, because although it has a lot less megapixels camera in the back and a lower (4K) video quality, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better photos and videos in poorly lited environments and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with just a little better battery life than LG K92, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.