Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-11-06 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Titan gray | Smoke black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| $ 395.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG K92 has a general score of 85.4, which is much better than Motorola Moto G Power's 76.1 global score. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android OS, but the LG K92 has an older 10 version and Motorola Moto G Power has Android 11. LG K92's design is thinner but a little heavier than Motorola Moto G Power, and both were only released 7 months apart.
LG K92 counts with just a little better hardware performance than Moto G Power, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG K92 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Motorola Moto G Power features a display that is just as good as the screen in LG K92, because although the Motorola Moto G Power has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2300 pixels and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a little higher pixels density.
LG K92 has a superior camera than Moto G Power, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for low-light photography and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the LG K92 also counts with a lot larger back camera sensor providing a way better image quality and a camera with lot more megapixels.
LG K92 features a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Moto G Power, because it has an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Motorola Moto G Power counts with greater battery lifetime than LG K92, because it has a 25 percent bigger battery capacity.
Although LG K92 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Moto G Power. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the LG K92, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Moto G Power, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.