Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-11-06 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Titan gray | Black, Gold and Gray |
| $ 395.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG K92 has a score of 85.4, which is better than the Moto Z Force's 75.8 global score. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but LG K92 has the previous 10 version and Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat. LG K92's design is notably newer than Moto Z Force's, although it's thicker and somewhat heavier.
The LG K92 has a bit better processing unit than Moto Z Force, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a greater number of cores. The Moto Z Force features a bit more vivid screen than LG K92, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater quantity of pixels per inch in the screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560.
The LG K92 counts with a greater storage for applications and games than Moto Z Force, and although they both have a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG K92 also has 128 GB internal storage. The LG K92 counts with a little longer battery performance than Moto Z Force, because it has a 14 percent larger battery size.
The LG K92 counts with a superior camera than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, a F1.8 aperture and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the LG K92 also has a lot more mega-pixels back camera.
LG K92 is a lot more expensive than Motorola Moto Z Force, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.