Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-06 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Titan gray | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| -- | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG K92 is much better than Moto Z2 Play, getting an 85.4 score against 77.4. The LG K92 construction is noticeably newer than Moto Z2 Play's, although it's noticeably thicker and a lot heavier. Moto Z2 Play features a screen that is just as good as LG K92's screen, because although the Moto Z2 Play has a little worse 1080 x 1920 resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little higher pixels number per display inch.
LG K92 counts with a better storage to store more games and applications than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a SD card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB, the LG K92 also has 128 GB internal storage. Moto Z2 Play features a processing unit that is just as good as the processor in LG K92, and although the Moto Z2 Play has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores.
LG K92 has better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 4000mAh battery size. The LG K92 takes greater videos and photos than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the LG K92 also counts with a back facing camera with a way higher resolution.
Although LG K92 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola Moto Z2 Play. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and give up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.