Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-11-06 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Titan gray | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG K92 is better than Motorola Moto Z3, having an 85.4 score against 77.6. The LG K92 is a newer cellphone than Motorola Moto Z3, but it's notably heavier and somewhat thicker. Both devices in this review include Android operating system, but LG K92 has the previous 10 version and Motorola Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Moto Z3 features a bit better processing power than LG K92, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Moto Z3 has a little more vivid display than LG K92, because although it has a quite smaller display and a bit lower 1080 x 2160 resolution, it also counts with a quite greater screen density.
LG K92 counts with more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Moto Z3, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG K92 also has 128 GB internal storage. LG K92 features longer battery lifetime than Moto Z3, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
LG K92 shoots a lot better videos and photos than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the LG K92 also has a back camera with a lot better 64 mega pixels resolution, a much larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a bigger diafragm aperture for better low light photography and video.
The LG K92 is more expensive than Motorola Moto Z3, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.