Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-11-06 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Titan gray | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| -- | Plastic |
| $ 395.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG K92 has an overall score of 85.4, which is a bit better than the Motorola One Hyper's global score of 79.8. Both devices in this comparison review have Android OS (operating system), but the LG K92 has the older 10 version while Motorola One Hyper has Android 11 version. The LG K92 design is newer and a little thinner, but a little bit heavier than the Motorola One Hyper.
The Motorola One Hyper and LG K92 both count with extremely similar displays, because although the Motorola One Hyper has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little better pixels density. LG K92 features a bigger storage to install applications and games than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the LG K92 also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG K92 counts with a little better performance than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG K92 also has more RAM memory. Motorola One Hyper and LG K92 count with similar battery performance. The LG K92 counts with a little bit better camera than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have the same resolution camera, the same video frame rate and the same video resolution, the LG K92 also has a bigger camera aperture.
The LG K92 is a little more expensive than Motorola One Hyper, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.