Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-06 | 2019-09-05 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Titan gray | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG K92 is a bit better than Motorola One Zoom, getting a score of 85.4 against 80. LG K92's construction is newer and a bit thinner, but just a little heavier than Motorola One Zoom. LG K92 and Motorola One Zoom have incredibly similar screens, because although the Motorola One Zoom has a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little better pixel number in each inch in the screen.
LG K92 has just a little better performance than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG K92 also has more RAM memory. The LG K92 counts with just a bit better camera than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for taking photos or videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a same size sensor, the LG K92 also counts with a much better 64 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera.
LG K92 counts with a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the LG K92 also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB. LG K92 and Motorola One Zoom have really similar batteries performance.
Even being the best phone in our current comparison, LG K92 is also the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.