Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-11-06 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Titan gray | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| $ 395.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) is just a bit better than the LG K92, having a overall score of 87 against 85.4. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola razr (2020) has a newer 11 version while LG K92 has Android 10, providing you a couple nice extra features. Motorola razr (2020) is a just a little lighter and just a little bit thinner phone than LG K92, even when both of them were released only 1 months apart.
Motorola razr (2020) counts with a little faster processor than LG K92, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The LG K92 features a bit sharper display than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a just a little higher count of pixels in each screen inch, a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little larger display.
The LG K92 counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB. The LG K92 counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
The LG K92 shoots a little bit better photos and videos than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for shooting photographs in low-light situations, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, the same sensor size and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the LG K92 also counts with a lot higher resolution camera.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG K92, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG K92. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy LG K92, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.