Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-11-06 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Titan gray | Cyber shade |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG K92 has a global score of 85.4, which is much better than nubia Red Magic 3S's global score of 75.8. The LG K92 construction is newer, just a bit lighter and thinner than nubia Red Magic 3S. Both phones in this review work with Android operating system, but LG K92 has 10 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features a bit more powerful processor than LG K92, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Nubia Red Magic 3S features a bit more vivid display than LG K92, although it has a bit worse pixel quantity per inch in the display and a bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, they both have a display of the same size.
The LG K92 counts with a lot bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Nubia Red Magic 3S features longer battery performance than LG K92, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
The nubia Red Magic 3S captures a bit better videos and photos than LG K92, because although it has a back-facing camera with a way lower resolution, and they both have a 0.5 inches back-facing camera sensor, the nubia Red Magic 3S also counts with a larger aperture to take better photos and video in poorly lited situations and a way higher video resolution.
In addition to being the best phone in our current comparison, LG K92 is also a bargain compared to the other phones, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.