Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-11-06 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Titan gray | Sonic silver |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG K92 is much better than the nubia Red Magic 5S, with a general score of 85.4 against 76.2. The LG K92 is a thinner and just a bit lighter device than nubia Red Magic 5S, even though both of them were only released with a few months difference. These phones include the same Android 10 OS (Operating System), so both of them should count with all the same operating system features.
The nubia Red Magic 5S has a little sharper display than LG K92, although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a bit worse number of pixels per display inch, they both have a display with the same size. LG K92 features a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than nubia Red Magic 5S, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the LG K92 also has a SD card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
Nubia Red Magic 5S features just a bit better processing power than LG K92, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has more RAM memory. Nubia Red Magic 5S has just a little bit longer battery performance than LG K92, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
The nubia Red Magic 5S features a little bit better camera than LG K92, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture and a back facing camera with a 64 mega-pixels resolution, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a bigger sensor which provides a higher photo and video quality and a much better 7680x4320 video quality.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, LG K92 is also a bargain compared to the other devices, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.