Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Oppo |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-11-06 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Titan gray | Ocean |
| -- | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG K92 is a bit better than the OPPO Find X2 Pro, getting an 85.4 score against 83.1. Even though the LG K92 and the OPPO Find X2 Pro were released only 6 months apart, the LG K92 is a little thinner and a little lighter. Both of these phones come with the same Android 10 OS (Operating System), so they should provide the user very similar operating system features.
OPPO Find X2 Pro features a bit better CPU than LG K92, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has 6 GB more RAM memory. The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a brighter display than LG K92, and although they both have a display of the same size, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has more pixels per inch of screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 3168px.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro takes a bit better photographs and videos than LG K92, because although it has a back facing camera with a lot lower 48 MP resolution and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better low-light photography and a way larger back-facing camera sensor capturing lot higher quality pictures and videos.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a slightly better memory capacity to store more apps and games than LG K92, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 384 GB more internal memory. OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with just a little better battery duration than LG K92, because it has a 4260mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.