Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-06 | 2019-03-02 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Titan gray | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG K92 is slightly better than Galaxy A30, getting an 85.4 score against 79.6. Although LG K92 is newer than the Galaxy A30, it's somewhat heavier and a little thicker. LG K92 counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy A30, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG K92 also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
LG K92 and Galaxy A30 count with similar screens, because although the Galaxy A30 has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite higher amount of pixels per inch in the screen. LG K92 shoots greater pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A30, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for capturing photographs in low-light situations, it also counts with a much better video definition, a camera in the back with a way higher 64 mega pixels resolution and a way bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
LG K92 has a way bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A30, because it has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal memory. Galaxy A30's battery life is very similar to the LG K92 one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.