Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-11-06 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Titan gray | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| $ 395.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 268 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG K92 is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A30s, getting a score of 85.4 against 79.8. These devices use Android OS, but the LG K92 has the older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy A30s has Android 11. LG K92's body is newer than Samsung Galaxy A30s's, although it's heavier and a little bit thicker.
LG K92 has just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A30s, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG K92 also has more RAM. LG K92 has a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because it has a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a little larger display and more pixels per inch in the screen.
The LG K92 counts with a way better camera than Galaxy A30s, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for taking photos in low-light environments, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a back facing camera with a much higher 64 megapixels resolution.
LG K92 features a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A30s, and although they both have the same internal storage, the LG K92 also has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy A30s has a battery life that is very similar to the battery lifetime in LG K92.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.