Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-11-06 | 2020-04-27 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Titan gray | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic |
| $ 395.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG K92 has a score of 85.4, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A31's overall score of 81.3. Both of these phones use the same Android 10 operating system, so you shouldn't see any difference regarding operating system features. Although the LG K92 and Samsung Galaxy A31 were only released with a couple months difference, the LG K92 construction is a bit thinner but a little bit heavier than Samsung Galaxy A31.
The LG K92 has a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy A31, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG K92 also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy A31 has a little sharper display than LG K92, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Galaxy A31 also counts with a just a bit better quantity of pixels per inch in the display.
LG K92 has a bit better camera than Galaxy A31, and although they both have a 0.5 inches back-facing camera sensor, the LG K92 also has a much better video definition, a bigger camera aperture and a much more mega pixels back-facing camera. LG K92 has a much better memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A31, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A31 counts with greater battery duration than LG K92, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.