Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-11-06 | 2021-02-25 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | -- |
| Titan gray | Awesome Black, Awesome Blue and Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 395.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Mediatek Helio G80 MT6769T chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG K92 has a global score of 85.4, which is slightly better than the Galaxy A32 LTE Only's 82 global score. Both of these devices come with Android operating system, but LG K92 has 10 version and Galaxy A32 LTE Only has Android 11. The LG K92 construction has the same thickness than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, but it is way heavier.
The LG K92 counts with a bit better processor than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG K92 also has a greater amount of RAM. The Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a little more vivid display than LG K92, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Galaxy A32 LTE Only also counts with a just a bit higher pixels count in each inch in the screen.
LG K92 features a superior camera than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, and although they both have the same resolution back-facing camera and a F1.8 camera aperture, the LG K92 also has a way better (4K) video resolution and a much larger sensor capturing way higher quality pictures and videos. LG K92 counts with a much bigger memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because it has 128 GB internal memory and an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy A32 LTE Only has longer battery duration than LG K92, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.