Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-11-06 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Titan gray | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG K92 has a general score of 85.4, which is just a bit better than Galaxy A35 5G's global score of 79.4. LG K92's design is just a little lighter than the Galaxy A35 5G, but it's a little bit thicker and was released 3 years before. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but LG K92 has an older 10 version and Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14.
LG K92 has a much powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G. Both of them have the same number of cores and a 6 GB RAM. Galaxy A35 5G has a bit better screen than LG K92, although it has a just a little worse count of pixels per screen inch, a quite smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px.
The LG K92 has a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a tinier sensor taking lower quality photos and videos, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the same 30 fps video frame rates and a same size aperture, the LG K92 also counts with a much more megapixels back-facing camera.
LG K92 features a lot bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the LG K92 also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G counts with better battery lifetime than LG K92, because it has a 25 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.