Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-11-06 | 2019-04-10 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 5.69 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 4.94 ounces |
| Titan gray | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 437 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Exynos 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3100mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG K92 has an overall score of 85.4, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A40's 79.6 score. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the LG K92 has older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy A40 has Android 11 version. Although LG K92 is newer than Samsung Galaxy A40, it is a little bit thicker and incredibly heavier.
LG K92 counts with a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A40, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG K92 also has 2 GB more RAM. The Galaxy A40 counts with just a bit better looking display than LG K92, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little better pixels density.
The LG K92 counts with a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy A40, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low light images and videos, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition, a back facing camera with lot more MP and a lot larger camera sensor providing a much better image quality.
The LG K92 counts with much more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A40, because it has more internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB. LG K92 has greater battery performance than Galaxy A40, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.