Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-11-06 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Titan gray | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 395.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 431 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG K92 has a global score of 85.4, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy A41's overall score of 81.7. LG K92 is better than the Galaxy A41, we must note that it's also a a bit thicker and heavier phone. Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS (Operating System), but LG K92 has the older 10 version and Galaxy A41 has Android 11.
Galaxy A41 has a bit sharper display than LG K92, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Galaxy A41 also counts with a just a bit greater number of pixels in each display inch. LG K92 counts with a much bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy A41, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The LG K92 counts with a little faster processing unit than Galaxy A41, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG K92 also has a higher amount of RAM. LG K92 shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A41, and although they both have a same size sensor, the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the LG K92 also has a larger aperture and a lot higher 64 mega pixels resolution camera.
The LG K92 features a bit better battery performance than Galaxy A41, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.