Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-06 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Titan gray | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG K92 has a general score of 85.4, which is better than Galaxy A5 (2017)'s 75.8 overall score. The LG K92 body is notably newer, but a little thicker and incredibly heavier than the Galaxy A5 (2017). LG K92 has a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG K92 also has more RAM.
Galaxy A5 (2017) counts with a bit sharper display than LG K92, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels and a lot smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per screen inch. LG K92 takes much better photos and videos than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a back camera with a lot higher 64 MP resolution, a much better video quality and a bigger aperture to capture better photos in low light situations.
LG K92 features a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has 128 GB internal memory and an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG K92 counts with improved battery performance than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a 33 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.