Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-11-06 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Titan gray | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50s has a score of 86.6, which is a little bit better than the LG K92's overall score of 85.4. Both of these devices come with the same Android 10 operating system. Although Samsung Galaxy A50s is older than LG K92, it's construction is a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter. The Galaxy A50s counts with a slightly better display than LG K92, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a bit higher pixel density.
The LG K92 features a very superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A50s, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the LG K92 also has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy A50s features just a bit better hardware performance than LG K92. They have 6 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores.
LG K92 shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A50s, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the same video quality and a same size sensor, the LG K92 also has a larger aperture to capture better captures in low light situations and a much more megapixels back camera.
Galaxy A50s's battery duration is just as good as the battery performance in LG K92.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.